Phone comparison · August 2026

iPhone 16 Pro vs Galaxy S25 Ultra

The ultimate premium smartphone showdown.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

₹1,19,900

Approx. · $1099 USD · as of August 2026

Best for video & ecosystem

No longer sold in India

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Samsung

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

₹1,09,999₹1,29,999

Approx. · $1299 USD · as of August 2026

Colours
  • Titanium Whitesilver
  • Titanium Silverblue
  • Titanium Black
  • Titanium Gray
Special
  • Titanium Pinkgold
  • Titanium Jadegreen
  • Titanium Jetblack
Best for display & zoom

Check the retailer for today’s price

Full spec comparison


Specification comparison between Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
SpeciPhone 16 ProGalaxy S25 Ultra
Display
Size6.3" (460 ppi)6.9" (17.42 cm)
TypeLTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, HDR10, Dolby VisionQHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution2622 × 12063120 × 1440 (QHD+) WINS
Refresh Rate1–120Hz ProMotion (LTPO)1–120Hz adaptive
Peak Brightness2000 nits (HBM), 1000 nits typical2600 nits
Always OnYesYes
Design & Build
Weight199 g218 g
FrameTitanium (grade 5)Titanium
GlassCeramic Shield (2024 gen) front, glass backCorning® Gorilla® Armor 2
ColoursBlack, White, Natural and Desert Titanium7 (4 standard + 3 special)
Water ResistanceIP68 (6 m for 30 min)IP68
S PenNoYes, built in
Performance
ChipsetApple A18 Pro (3 nm)Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
CPUHexa-core 2×4.05GHz + 4×2.42GHzOcta-core 4.47GHz / 3.5GHz
GPUApple GPU (6-core)Not recorded
RAM8 GB12 GB WINS
Storage128 GB / 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB (NVMe)256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB WINS
ExpandableNoNo
AI Features
AI PlatformApple IntelligenceGalaxy AI
Camera & Zoom
Main Camera48 MP f/1.8, 24mm, 1/1.28", sensor-shift OIS200 MP f/1.7, OIS WINS
Ultra-wide48 MP f/2.2, 13mm50 MP f/1.9
Telephoto12 MP f/2.8, 120mm periscope, 5× optical10 MP f/2.4 (3×) + 50 MP f/3.4 (5×) WINS
Max Optical Zoom3× and 5× (plus 2× and 10× optical-quality)
Max Digital ZoomNot recorded100×
Front Camera12 MP f/1.9, PDAF, OIS12 MP f/2.2
Video (max)4K @ 120fps, Dolby Vision, ProRes8K @ 30fps
Video StabilisationSensor-shift OIS + gyro-EISOIS
Night ModeNight modeNightography
ProRes VideoYesNo
Battery
Capacity3582 mAh5000 mAh WINS
Wired ChargingPD 2.0 — 50% in 30 min45W WINS
Wireless25W MagSafe / Qi2 (15W in China) WINS15W Qi2
Reverse WirelessYes (4.5W, wired)Not recorded
Battery LifeNot recordedUp to 31 hrs video playback
Software & Connectivity
OSiOS 18 (upgradable to iOS 26.6)Android 15, One UI 7
OS UpdatesNot recorded7 years guaranteed
5G BandsYesYes (Sub-6)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 (802.11be), tri-bandWi-Fi 7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth5.35.4
Satellite SOSEmergency SOS, Messages and Find My WINSNo
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPortUSB-C 3.2 Gen 1
BuildTitanium (grade 5) + Ceramic ShieldTitanium + Gorilla Armor 2

Cells marked WINS are where that phone measurably beats the other. Unmarked rows are a tie or not directly comparable. Not recorded means we have not verified that figure yet — it does not mean the phone lacks the feature.

Pros & cons


iPhone 16 Pro

  • Superior video recording capabilities
  • More compact and easier to hold
  • Seamless integration with Macs and iPads
  • Smaller battery capacity
  • Slower wired charging

Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • Massive 6.9-inch high-resolution display
  • Built-in S Pen stylus
  • Versatile quad-camera system with extreme zoom
  • Very large and heavy
  • Higher starting price

Detailed analysis


The usual assumption with these two is that you pay more for the iPhone and get the more premium object. On current Indian pricing that is backwards: the iPhone 16 Pro is ₹1,19,900 and the Galaxy S25 Ultra is ₹1,09,999. The Samsung is roughly ₹10,000 cheaper and has more hardware.

Where the Galaxy S25 Ultra is measurably ahead

  • Display: 6.9-inch at 3120 × 1440 against 6.3-inch at 2622 × 1206. Bigger and sharper.
  • Memory: 12 GB against 8 GB.
  • Base storage: 256 GB against 128 GB. At the entry tier that gap alone is worth real money.
  • Main camera: 200 MP against 48 MP.
  • Telephoto: two of them — 10 MP at 3× and 50 MP at 5× — against a single 12 MP 5×. The 3× is the one you will actually reach for most.
  • Battery: 5,000 mAh against 3,582 mAh, quoted at up to 31 hours of video playback.
  • Wired charging: 45W against 38W.
  • S Pen: built in. The iPhone has no stylus.

Where the iPhone 16 Pro is ahead

Wireless charging: 25W MagSafe against 15W Qi2, and the magnetic accessory ecosystem around MagSafe is genuinely useful — mounts, wallets and battery packs that attach and stay attached.

Satellite SOS: the iPhone 16 Pro can contact emergency services without cellular coverage. The S25 Ultra cannot. If you hike, drive remote routes, or travel off-grid, this is not a spec-sheet nicety — it is the single most consequential difference on this page.

Size: at 6.3 inches the iPhone is substantially more manageable than a 6.9-inch Ultra. Whether that is an advantage depends entirely on your hands and pockets, which is why we have not scored screen size for either phone.

Video and ecosystem. Apple's video pipeline remains the reference point on phones, particularly for stabilisation and consistency across lighting changes. And if you own a Mac, iPad or AirPods, the handoff behaviour is a real daily convenience that no spec row captures.

Cameras: reach versus consistency

The S25 Ultra's advantage is reach and flexibility. Two telephoto lenses mean genuine optical zoom at both 3× and 5×, where the iPhone jumps straight to 5× and crops for anything between. For concerts, sport, wildlife or simply photographing your kids across a room, that middle range matters more than most spec comparisons admit.

The iPhone's advantage is consistency. Colour science holds together across the lenses, video is dependable without fiddling, and results are predictable. Samsung's processing is more aggressive — often more impressive at a glance, occasionally less faithful.

200 MP against 48 MP sounds decisive and mostly is not. Both bin down to sensible output sizes. The lens count is the difference that shows up in real photographs.

The 128 GB problem

Worth isolating, because it changes the price comparison. The iPhone 16 Pro starts at 128 GB; the S25 Ultra starts at 256 GB. If you would upgrade the iPhone to 256 GB — and shooting ProRes video, most people should — the real gap widens well beyond ₹10,000. Compare like tiers before deciding.

The cost of switching is real, and it is not on the spec sheet

If you are already inside one of these ecosystems, the honest comparison is not iPhone against Galaxy — it is the cost of moving. Purchased apps do not transfer. iMessage threads do not follow you to Android, and group chats you leave behind will notice. AirPods work with Android but lose fast pairing and automatic device switching. A Mac paired with an iPhone hands off calls, clipboard and Continuity Camera; paired with a Galaxy it does not.

None of that makes either phone better. It does mean a ₹10,000 hardware advantage can be wiped out by a weekend of migration and a year of small friction. Weigh it honestly before treating this as a pure specification decision.

Longevity

Samsung guarantees 7 years of OS updates on the S25 Ultra. Apple does not publish a guaranteed window, but has historically supported iPhones for five to six years. For most buyers both comfortably outlast the phone's practical life, so this matters mainly if you intend to keep it past the five-year mark or you care about resale to someone who will.

A note on the table above

Several rows read Not recorded for the iPhone 16 Pro. That means we have not yet verified an equivalent figure for that device — it does not mean the feature is missing. We would rather show a gap in our data than publish a number we have not checked.

Who should buy which

Buy the Galaxy S25 Ultra if you want more phone for less money, you use zoom often, you want the S Pen, or you value battery life and base storage. It is the better hardware buy, and it is the cheaper one.

Buy the iPhone 16 Pro if you already own Apple devices, you shoot a lot of video, you want a phone this capable in a smaller body, or you want satellite SOS. That last one is worth the price difference on its own for the right person.

Our verdict

On current Indian pricing the Galaxy S25 Ultra is both cheaper (₹1,09,999 against ₹1,19,900) and better equipped — larger and sharper display, 12 GB against 8 GB, 256 GB base storage against 128 GB, dual telephoto against single, a 5,000 mAh battery, and the S Pen. The iPhone 16 Pro answers with 25W MagSafe, a more manageable 6.3-inch body, the strongest video pipeline on any phone, satellite SOS, and the Apple ecosystem. If you are choosing on hardware and value, take the Ultra. If you are already in Apple’s world, shoot video seriously, or want satellite emergency contact, the iPhone justifies its premium.

Buy the iPhone 16 Pro if…

Best pick if you want unparalleled video recording, a compact pro-level device, and seamless Apple ecosystem integration.

Buy the Galaxy S25 Ultra if…

Best pick if you want the ultimate display, the built-in S Pen, and an unmatched zoom camera system.

Frequently asked questions


Which phone has a better display?

The Galaxy S25 Ultra. It is larger at 6.9 inches against 6.3, and sharper at 3120 × 1440 against 2622 × 1206. Both run adaptive refresh up to 120Hz.

Does the iPhone 16 Pro have a stylus?

No. Only the Galaxy S25 Ultra includes a built-in stylus, the S Pen.

Which is cheaper, the iPhone 16 Pro or the Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Galaxy S25 Ultra, at ₹1,09,999 against ₹1,19,900 — about ₹10,000 less. The gap is effectively larger because the S25 Ultra starts at 256 GB while the iPhone starts at 128 GB.

Which has the better camera for zoom?

The Galaxy S25 Ultra. It has two telephoto lenses — 10 MP at 3× and 50 MP at 5× — while the iPhone 16 Pro has a single 12 MP 5× and crops digitally for anything shorter.

Does the Galaxy S25 Ultra have satellite SOS?

No. Satellite emergency contact is available on the iPhone 16 Pro and not on the S25 Ultra. If you travel outside cellular coverage, that is a meaningful difference.

Which phone has better battery life?

The Galaxy S25 Ultra, with a 5,000 mAh battery quoted at up to 31 hours of video playback, against 3,582 mAh in the iPhone 16 Pro. The iPhone charges faster wirelessly at 25W MagSafe against 15W.

Related comparisons


More from Hey Friday


Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. This never affects which phone we recommend — our verdicts are written before any link is added. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Prices are indicative and change often — check the retailer for current pricing.

Try Hey Friday free

Voice-first AI assistant that runs in your browser. No download, no credit card.

Get early accessSee what it does